empty
empty


Patrick R. Casey Brings Winning Advocacy Experience to Elliott Greenleaf Law Firm


Henry F. Siedzikowski Named a Trustee of Juniata College
empty
read moreempty
empty
read moreempty

 

empty
empty
empty

Elliott Greenleaf Wins Appeal On Election Law Issue of First Impression in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Elliott Greenleaf successfully obtained a reversal of a trial court ruling when the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in an issue of first impression in the Commonwealth, reinstated a Borough of Darby councilperson in a contested political battle in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.

This case arose from the Borough Council's filling a vacancy on the Council upon the untimely death of a councilperson in March. With the advice of its then solicitor, the Borough Council appointed Theresa Coghlan to the Office. For reasons unknown, no election for the Office was held at the November 4, 2003 Municipal Election. On January 5, 2004, after control of the Borough Council changed as a result of the 2003 Municipal Election, the Borough Council held its biennial organization meeting. The parties agreed that, as a matter of law, on January 5, 2004, Mrs. Coghlan's term as a councilperson expired, leaving the Office of First Ward Councilperson vacant. Borough Council filled the vacancy by appointing Marie Howells to the vacant position.

The Commonwealth Court, in an opinion by Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, on behalf of the three judge panel, agreed with Elliott Greenleaf's arguments, and ruled that the Council properly nominated and elected a duly qualified resident of the Borough's First Ward to fill the existing vacancy caused by the expiration of Mrs. Coghlan's term. The Commonwealth Court also ruled that the new councilperson's term of office extends until January 2, 2006; that an elector lacks standing to bring a civil action seeking removal of a borough councilperson; that the borough council acted properly and in accordance with the Borough Code by filling a vacant council seat on January 5, 2004; and, the trial court lacked authority to order a special election in a borough.

The Borough of Darby and its Borough Council were represented by the Firm's shareholder, Raymond J. Santarelli.

empty
 
empty

Philadelphia/Blue Bell
Elliott Greenleaf
& Siedzikowski, P.C.

925 Harvest Drive
P.O. Box 3010
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Phone: (215) 977-1000
Fax: (215) 977-1099
map >>

Philadelphia
Elliott Greenleaf
1818 Market Street
Suite 3750   
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: (215) 977-1000
map >>

Harrisburg
Elliott Greenleaf & Balaban
Governors' Row
27 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Phone: (717) 234-3282
Fax: (717) 233-4264
map >>

Scranton
Elliott Greenleaf & Dean
PNC Bank Adm. Building
201 Penn Avenue, Suite 202
Scranton , PA 18503
Phone: (570) 346-7569
Fax: (570) 969-2890
map >>

Wilmington
Elliott Greenleaf
1105 Market Street, Suite 1700
Wilmington, DE 19801
Phone: (302) 384-9400
Fax: (302) 384-9399
map >>

Wilkes-Barre
Elliott Greenleaf & Dean
39 Public Square, Suite 1000
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702
Phone: (570) 371-5290
Fax: (570) 371-5550
map >>

empty

Terms of Use | Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2003-2011 Elliott Greenleaf. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Elliott Greenleaf only provides legal advice after having entered into an attorney-client relationship, which our website specifically does not create. Only having entered into a written, signed agreement with Elliott Greenleaf is an attorney-client relationship created.Because every case is different, the descriptions of awards and cases previously handled are not meant to be a guarantee of success. Any electronic communication sent to Elliott Greenleaf may not be secure, and thus may be disclosed. Accordingly, we request that you do not send sensitive or confidential information electronically. In addition, the sending of electronic mail to any lawyer or other address identified in this website does not create a lawyer-client relationship. The contents of any such mail are not privileged, unless the sender is a current client of Elliott Greenleaf, and the communication is sent pursuant to that attorney-client relationship.